MedSmarts

~ Becoming CEO of the rest of your life

Are America’s Healthcare Patients Too Trusting?

MedSmart Patients Are Skeptics

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

One of the “take-home” lessons of MedSmart Patients is that much of healthcare practice – experts estimate as much as 80%[1] – has no evidence to support it.

This helps explain why almost half of U.S. medical care is considered unnecessary, sub-standard and inappropriate.[2]

It may also explain why medical errors in the U.S., combined with over-reliance on dangerous prescription drugs, contribute to an estimated 200,000 or more avoidable deaths a year – causing more deaths than breast, colon, prostate, and pancreatic cancers combined.[3]

This is simply not the kind of healthcare performance that justifies the blind trust the consuming public routinely places in American medicine.

Think about it: what would you call someone anxious to surrender her or his life to an industry responsible for more accidental deaths than any industry on earth – and who submits to it enthusiastically,  always seeking more interventions?

Would you call them prudent consumers?

Or would you find them too trusting, maybe even naïve, about their medical care? Knowing what you know about our state of medical dysfunction – or soon will – might you even call them reckless?  

Real Medical Emergencies

This phenomenon is discussed in MedSmarts in the context of the unjustified trust – and resulting passivity – many consumers place in EMTs in times of medical emergencies.

It’s understandable that people panic in the face of medical emergencies and welcome the arrival of an ambulance to take the victim to the nearest hospital.

ambulance is often first line of healthcare in AmericaAnd while most of us assume there are standards in place for treating cardiac arrest victims at the scene, for example, the reality is there are no such national standards in place.

One study found EMTs spend less than half their time at the scene of a cardiac arrest performing vital chest compressions that keep oxygenated blood flowing to victims’ brains and other vital organs.[4]

This helps to explain why more than 9 out of 10 victims die from cardiac arrest before hospital discharge. Other studies show that continuous (uninterrupted) chest compressions triple cardiac arrest victims’ probability of survival. Yet only two states have adopted this standardized approach to emergency treatment of cardiac arrest victims.

It’s unlikely most consumers will do anything about such poor performance out of simple apathy and the pressures of making ends meet in a deteriorating economy. But those at several times the average risk for heart attack or stroke – which includes tens of millions of Americans – should think hard before surrendering to such inadequate healthcare.

Their odds of falling victim to medical malfeasance are far greater than average.

This audience – diabetics, hypertensives, and others at moderate-to-high risk with chronic disease – have the most to lose by passively accepting medical malfeasance that could cause them a premature death or a lifetime of disability.

And Bogus Emergencies

And it doesn’t stop with medical emergencies. The vast majority of elective open heart surgeries, angioplasties, spine surgeries, hip and knee replacements are unnecessary – as amply documented in the MedSmarts materials. Most patients don’t even realize many of these procedures are elective – they’re allowed to believe they’re emergencies and lifesaving procedures when they’re neither.

In other words, much of medical care in the U.S. is bogus. Yet health care reformers believe they’ve accomplished great things by exposing over 30 million more Americans to what are often bogus medical treatments and procedures.

True healthcare reform would go beyond health insurance to redress these abuses and failings in the delivery of medical care before millions more Americans are victimized.

Some of the uninsured will undoubtedly benefit with better access to healthcare, but others will be worse off unless fundamental reforms in the way healthcare is delivered are instituted before healthcare reform, or Obamacare, takes full effect.

While there are modest attempts to address these issues, at least cosmetically, there’s nothing in Obamacare that comes close to getting at the core systemic flaws discussed elsewhere on this blog and, in more detail, in the MedSmarts program..

Click here to be notified when MedSmarts is available.


[1] Medical Rip-offs, Missing Evidence. consumerreports.org.
[2] The price of excess: Identifying waste in healthcare spending, PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute, 4/08.
[3] Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. American Cancer Society. cancer.org.
[4] Interruptions of chest compressions during emergency medical systems resuscitation. Circulation 2005;122:1259-65.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Like this post? Sign up for Free to get more.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

4 Awesome Comments So Far

Don't be a stranger, join the discussion by leaving your own comment
  1. Donald Quixote
    August 21, 2013 at 12:31 pm #

    It is an interesting post talking about the calamity of the healthcare in the U.S. but what would suggest are some alternatives to better the situation?

    • John Lynch
      August 24, 2013 at 2:44 pm #

      Hi Donald. I suggest ways to better the situation in virtually every post. One is to get educated about medical matters that concern you and to stop relying on the often incorrect advice of a single physician. Even the honest ones are often wrong – misdiagnosis is at the core of medical errors. Most patients remain more passive and accepting of medical advice than the data supports as reasonable.

      It’s tough to be proactive about your healthcare needs – including avoiding medical interventions you DON’T need – without gaining the confidence only education can provide.

  2. Dan
    March 24, 2013 at 10:40 am #

    Do you have a link to the studies on 19 out of 20 cardiac arrest patients die before leaving the hospital? Doesn’t seem correct to me, but would love to read about it. Thanks in advance.

    • John Lynch
      March 24, 2013 at 3:37 pm #

      Hi Dan,

      My original link – Cardiac Arrest. americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4481 – is no longer active, but in it the AHA then stated only 5-6% of arrest victims survived to hospital discharge (hence my 19 out of 20 victims not surviving comment).

      They now say only 8% survive – see
      http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/CPRAndECC/WhatisCPR/CPRFactsandStats/CPR-Statistics_UCM_307542_Article.jsp. So it’s improved some, but still more than 18 of 20 won’t survive, so the point remains sadly valid.

      As I stated in response to another of your comments, my point isn’t to bash EMTs – far from it. They do heroic and lifesaving work, often under grossly sub-optimal conditions. One of those is the reality that they’re understaffed.

      The obvious conclusion if they’re generally unable to maintain the continuous chest compressions arrest victims need most isn’t to denigrate them, but to give them more help. Until then, victims’ families and/or other bystanders have to take up the slack if they want to improve these rather dismal odds of survival.

      I’ve updated the post to reflect this change. It now says “more than 9 out of 10” don’t survive, which reflects this more current performance. Thanks for questioning it.

Leave a Comment

Remember to play nicely folks, nobody likes a troll.